ed a case with them.
> 73,
> Fred KE7X
>
> -Original Message-
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David Cole
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:19 AM
> To: Phil Hystad
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
15, 2014 9:19 AM
To: Phil Hystad
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] The Elecraft K3, design configuration, etc...
Hi,
I did just that... We will see how they respond. I now have a case number.
All automated so far. No human involved. Thank you for the idea.
--
Thanks and
IIRC, I got my copy in a few days.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
On 4/15/2014 7:55 AM, Phil Hystad wrote:
Complain to LuLu and then ask for a downloadable PDF copy while you wait. I
ordered my copy from LuLu but can't remember how long it took.
PEH's iPad
On Apr 15, 2014, at 7:04 AM, David Cole wrote:
Hi,
I did just that... We will see how they respond. I now have a case
number. All automated so far. No human involved. Thank you for the
idea.
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/
Thanks!!!
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups
Complain to LuLu and then ask for a downloadable PDF copy while you wait. I
ordered my copy from LuLu but can't remember how long it took.
PEH's iPad
> On Apr 15, 2014, at 7:04 AM, David Cole wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Has anyone ordered this book from Lulu before? Any idea what the
> delivery time is
Hi,
Has anyone ordered this book from Lulu before? Any idea what the
delivery time is like? I ordered it before I ordered the radio to
insure it was here when I got the rig, and it is still not here...
Elecraft built the radio faster than Lulu can print the The K3 book...
--
Thanks and 73's,
John Watkins wrote:
> K3 Design - Cost, schedule and performance
> When you design and ultimately go into production with
> any piece of equipment for the purposes of making a profit/paying the
> bills you have three variables that are always competing with each
> other as your team proceeds. The
K3 Design - Cost, schedule and performance
First, I am not a radio designer by any stretch of the imagination. Love my K3.
Now about the Elecraft design philosophy versus their competition. When you
design and ultimately go into production with any piece of equipment for the
purposes of making
I just went an ordered everything I was likely to want,
the Elecraft prices are low for the performance in my book.
I DID order the base K3 and 6KHz filter in the first batch, then
later on ordered all the other goodies, so I don't know if it
will all come at once or not.
(I like surprises)
I wo
> Unless I'm mistaken, I AM being forced to pay for an ATU
> option in order to get a 2nd antenna input and to pay for a
> transverter option to get a rx antenna input. I'm thrilled
> about the K3, just not thrilled about this part of the option matrix.
Yes, this is true for now. Can't say wh
W4ZV penned: "Count me as one who is thankful I am not forced to pay
for General Coverage, FM, AM, ATU, bandscopes and a host of other
features I don't need. Of course all of these
are possible for extra cost, but I'm not forced to pay for the
features I don't need and will never use."
Unless I'
-Original Message-
From: Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder if, with today's computer control and other
fancy tricks like switched in band pass filters, wide range
vfo gizmos, etc, if it would be possible to build a single conversion
receiver with a 455 KHz IF frequency.
Wi
Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett N2DTS --
I wonder if, with today's computer control and other
fancy tricks like switched in band pass filters, wide range
vfo gizmos, etc, if it would be possible to build a single conversion
receiver with a 455 KHz IF frequency.
With good filters and DSP,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, J F wrote:
Elecraft QSL cards in the future showing the product
line??
Might be interesting if someone who deals with the printer came up
with a K3 design that could be used for a group buy.
Thom,EIEIO
k3hrn
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
www.baltimore
Amen Bill!
If I want the features, I'll buy the module or add on.
Elecraft thought this one thru as well IMHO. Looks
like the rig will not only be a contest favorite, but
a DXpedition and mobile player as well.
Glad to know KL3R was running a K3, managed to land
them on 20M... will have to get a
> I wonder if, with today's computer control and other
> fancy tricks like switched in band pass filters, wide range
> vfo gizmos, etc, if it would be possible to build a single conversion
> receiver with a 455 KHz IF frequency.
>
> With good filters and DSP, could it work?
The DSP can't help f
I wonder if, with today's computer control and other
fancy tricks like switched in band pass filters, wide range
vfo gizmos, etc, if it would be possible to build a single conversion
receiver with a 455 KHz IF frequency.
With good filters and DSP, could it work?
Brett
N2DTS
_
Another thing elecraft is doing with the K3 is to put in
ham band only bandpass filters, with general
coverage filters optional, but when operating in the ham bands, the
ham band filter is switched in.
The single conversion is likely the major reason the K3
(and the K2) are so good.
My homebrew
Don,
You bring up some valid considerations.
When I first got into ham radio back in the mid-50s, the big selling
points for any receiver were sensitivity and selectivity. Not much
mention of IMD, dynamic range, signal to noise ratio, etc. The
evolution of ham receivers regarding the number
Amen to that, Bill.
73,
Larry N8LP
Bill Tippett wrote:
Count me as one who is thankful I am not forced to
pay for General Coverage, FM, AM, ATU, bandscopes and
a host of other features I don't need. Of course all of these
are possible for extra cost, but I'm not forced to pay for th
From the K3 FAQ:
>With a first IF of around 8 MHz, how can the receiver be general
coverage? Will there not at least be hole in the coverage around the
IF frequency?
>General does not mean continuous in this case. There is a small gap
at 8.215 MHz. You may be able to tune to this frequenc
ievendorff
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:55 PM
To: 'Don Rasmussen'; 'Elecraft'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 Design
I'll guess.
The way my other rigs get general coverage is to up convert to an IF that's
higher
than all the frequencies the radio supports. In the ICOM HF
here is
some
clever engineering to deal with that range.
Dick, K6KR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Rasmussen
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 3:41 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Design
After seeing the QST ads for the OMNI VI+ fo
After seeing the QST ads for the OMNI VI+ for so many
years, where they showed the noise floor rise to cover
up small signals inside your passband by larger
signals outside of the passband - and knowing that the
OMNI VI+ is a ham bands only rig, it seemed to
indicate that any of the radios that off
25 matches
Mail list logo
