AD6XY - Mike wrote:
>
> Yes - but where the UK leads at least in the US they get the voice of
> reason on AM for ironic entertainment. All we get is 5 live and a few
> local radio stations.
>
> In terms of audio quality, I think there has been a reduction in recent
> years. It is AM so it
Yes - but where the UK leads at least in the US they get the voice of
reason on AM for ironic entertainment. All we get is 5 live and a few local
radio stations.
In terms of audio quality, I think there has been a reduction in recent
years. It is AM so it does not matter sort of attitude. Ye
AD6XY - Mike wrote:
>
> Most of these AM transmissions in the UK are very poor quality to begin
> with. Not just the content, but also the audio compression and filtering.
> The better the quality of the radio you use, the more you notice this.
>
I don't see why this would be specific to the UK
Most of these AM transmissions in the UK are very poor quality to begin with.
Not just the content, but also the audio compression and filtering. The
better the quality of the radio you use, the more you notice this.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/K3-General-Coverage-Rec
BReese wrote:
>
> I just installed my General Receive Option on my K3, and it seems the
> audio quality on AM radio freqs (640-1070) are very poor quality. I'm i
> missing something? Did i get the right option for listening to AM radio?
> OI have the default filter that came my K3.
>
If you wan
5 matches
Mail list logo
