Yes but just to note that the specific issue raised here concerns RECEIVE
audio quality, not TRANSMIT audio quality.
73,
Barry N1EU
ab2tc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If the Ducie and Clipperton island expeditions were used to judge the
> transmit audio quality of the K3 (Ducie) and the Pro III, K3 wo
Hi,
If the Ducie and Clipperton island expeditions were used to judge the
transmit audio quality of the K3 (Ducie) and the Pro III, K3 would emerge as
a clear winner. TX5C audio varies from fair to poor, often muddled with no
highs at all. Once when they changed operator, the audio immediately we
OK, so here's my question. How is the K3 audio compared to the K2? I'm
only interested in CW purity and low noise. I remember the K1 sounded
great, K2 wasn't quite as good but is still good. I'm assuming the K3
takes another small step downward due to more processing stages.
Anyone out there w
Dave,
The rig sounds much like a IC-765..IMHO. I have found that it is not harsh to
my ears, but my ears are not perfect. To many hours with headphones on...to
much rock and roll...to much time behind the console at the radio stations.
It is much better than the 756PROII and is much more quie
I actually listened to the entire Sherwood presentation to
the Boulder Amateur Radio Club while I was puttering around
today.
http://www.sherweng.com/audio/Barc-Edited.mp3
Some of his comments addressed the K3 and were quite
complimentary. At 1:12:49 into the presentation, he did
mention that
5 matches
Mail list logo
