...@arrl.net
Cc:elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 LC settings recall -- complete explanation
(including auxBus tradeoffs)
Message-ID:c5be2d64-b735-4503-a2bf-897794ecf...@elecraft.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
So what we're talking about
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 11:29 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 LC settings recall -- complete explanation
I have been reading some
] On Behalf Of Larry Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 11:29 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 LC settings recall -- complete explanation
I have been reading some of the KAT500 traffic and thought I'd weigh in
with
my particular thoughts.
One reason to have
ab2tc wrote:
...the question is if it's worth doing to save that one little
squirt of RF needed to tell the tuner the exact frequency.
At present the KAT500 works exactly the same as the KAT3:
(1) On any band change or antenna change, the last-used LC settings
for that band and antenna
Wayne wrote:
So what we're talking about now is whether it would be worth sending
frequency data from the K3 to the KAT500--at the time of keying--over
either the auxBus or the RS232 port. The answer, IMHO, is no. In
either case it would take approximately the same amount of time to
During a contest and for many ops with headphones on you wouldn't hear the
relays. Make it an option.
As for the timing if the KAT500 tunes as the receiver is tuned timing is
zero.
73,
Keith, XE3/K5ENS
--
View this message in context:
Keith-K5ENS wrote:
During a contest and for many ops with headphones on you wouldn't
hear the
relays. Make it an option.
It's a possibility. I'll look into it.
Wayne
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
7 matches
Mail list logo
