> If the KBPF3 modification compromises performance elsewhere in the
> coverage, I might be better off using my current approach: A
> home-brew transverter for 630m coverage with a 10.0 - 10.5 MHz IF
> with home-brew sharp cut off low pass filter ahead of the RF input.
The KBPF3 modification
I am considering the Elecraft modification to the KBPF3 for 630m coverage on my
K3. Is there any information published on the band pass filter performance
before and after the modification?
If the KBPF3 modification compromises performance elsewhere in the coverage, I
might be better off using
2 matches
Mail list logo
