Ah...so this means us Elecraft users are waiting on this feature to be
implemented in the K4...got it, thanks!
Tim
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023, 3:56 AM David Decoons wrote:
> The sample output on the amp is already enabled. You just need a radio
> that supports adaptive predistortion.
>
> Dave wo2x
>
The sample output on the amp is already enabled. You just need a radio that
supports adaptive predistortion.
Dave wo2x
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 19, 2023, at 1:19 AM, Tim Tucker wrote:
>
> Is there an ETA on when the TX Sample output on the KPA1500 will be enabled
> for Pure Signal?
>
> Th
Is there an ETA on when the TX Sample output on the KPA1500 will be enabled
for Pure Signal?
Thx,
AE6LX
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:El
: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample
The P3 TX monitor and SWR/Wattmeter option also does a great job at this. :-)
73,
Eric
/elecraft.com/
On 3/23/2018 11:55 AM, Mel Farrer via Elecraft wrote:
> While all of the info is correct, I also like to mention that an inline
> station monitor is also a
On 3/23/2018 11:33 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I think there will be more information to come about its function. For
the time being, it is safe to assume it is not a calibrated output,
but simply a tap to observe the output waveform, rather than an
amplitude measuring device.
The most obvious us
The P3 TX monitor and SWR/Wattmeter option also does a great job at this. :-)
73,
Eric
/elecraft.com/
On 3/23/2018 11:55 AM, Mel Farrer via Elecraft wrote:
While all of the info is correct, I also like to mention that an inline station
monitor is also a great device. I use a old Kenwood SM-22
hint of distortion.
Lots of info on its use.
Mel, K6KBE
From: Don Wilhelm
To: David Box ; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample
Dave,
Since that "coupler" has only one output, it is not a full forward an
Dave,
Since that "coupler" has only one output, it is not a full forward and
reverse coupler, so it could be nothing more than a toroid output with
the wire carrying the full output going through the center of the core -
in other words, it can just be an "RF Sampler", and in that case it
woul
Don
Was fairly certain that units were used incorrect but ya' never know so
appreciate confirmation.
Wanting to get linearity test ready so now I know what is needed to set
up. I always want to monitor a new amp and the inclusion of this output
allows that.
Now I do have one other "assump
David,
It is just a coupler - nothing else makes sense for that use, so your
-60dB assumption is correct. Yes, it is relative to the output, so dBm
is not the proper designation.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 3/23/2018 10:09 AM, David Box wrote:
I am trying to get ready for delivery of the KPA1500 and h
I am trying to get ready for delivery of the KPA1500 and have become
confused about the information available for the TX Sample port.
The only information I can find states that this is a low-level signal
of -60dBm but dBm is a measure of absolute power which would put this
signal at 1 nanowat
11 matches
Mail list logo
