I have the T1 and the KAT2 fot the K2 the KAT2 seems to also be a better tuner.
But the T1 is still a good tuner.
Original message
From: Mike Morrow
Date: 2017-03-27 9:53 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 ATU question
A tabular summary
A tabular summary of the various Elecraft ATU characteristics was made by me
here on 24 May 2016. Next is the posting with the tabulation, attached below a
response from Wayne with important KXAT2 design remarks, compared to the T1:
http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/elecraft/2016-May/232436.h
Dave and All,
A while back, some enterprising person had posted a rather nice summary of
all the Elecraft ATU's showing numbers of tuning combinations, etc. I can't
find it now, but maybe someone can post it again. It may have been here on
this reflector, or otherwise, on the KX3 reflector.
beat that with a stick!!!
73,
Bill
K9YEQ
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Irma &
Linas(LY2H)
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 5:00 PM
To: Dave Fugleberg ; Elecraft List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 ATU question
Dave,
Pretty much
Dave,
Pretty much the same to my experience. I have the T-1 for some 10 years
and the KX-2 with the ATU installed for some 1 month, :). May be too early
to make judgements but both tuners were equally good in tuning the random
wire of some 9 m, also a 12m length vertical dipole fed by the 400 ohm
How does the optional internal ATU for the KX2 compare to the Elecraft T1
ATU in terms of tuning range? In other words, if a given length of wire
works well with the T1, can one expect it to work with the KX2 internal
tuner?
I have a T1, but not a KX2 (at least not yet).
Is it a similar design?
6 matches
Mail list logo