Ed:
Please allow me to second your suggestion for a “KXV3Sat”, though a KX2
derivative with FM + VHF + UHF and full duplex would certainly be another
option that would be very intriguing. Whether such a design built into a K2/K3
footprint (with or without HF) is feasible from an engineering/cos
傳送日期︰ 2016年05月25日 (週三) 8:17 AM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
I have changed my thinking on this.
My suggestion would be a kick butt single band 6m rig in a K3s box. All
the bells and whistles the K3s has now with the addition of cross band
duplex and 100W
Cole
收件人︰ David Anderson
副本(CC)︰ Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2016年05月25日 (週三) 6:47 PM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
David,
At 12:43 AM 5/25/2016, David Anderson wrote:
>When I was active on the linear transponders of AO6 through to AO13
>I ne
I replied in depth to Barry but let me share that more briefly with the List:
My vision for a "KXV3sat" would be based on a 50-MHz direct
conversion SDR (if that is practical at this time).
That would establish the IF for other bands which would be
accomplished with transverters. HF would be
Ed, re "Who will build it?": It seems the market
must be large enough to justify the investment. I
wonder if it really is?
73, Phil W7OX
On 5/24/16 2:33 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
I replied in depth to Barry but let me share
that more briefly with the List:
My vision for a "KXV3sat" would be
I like it!
Especially the laptop style dock.
On 5/24/2016 4:33 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
I replied in depth to Barry but let me share that more briefly with
the List:
My vision for a "KXV3sat" would be based on a 50-MHz direct conversion
SDR (if that is practical at this time).
That would esta
I have changed my thinking on this.
My suggestion would be a kick butt single band 6m rig in a K3s box. All
the bells and whistles the K3s has now with the addition of cross band
duplex and 100W any mode no time limit. The other bands would be
installed as transverters in a computer style main
some of this use as well.
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:16:38 -0700
From: Phil Wheeler
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
Message-ID: <7f140668-ae11-ec14-9ac4-91a72a13a...@socal.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=window
I hate saying "me too" but I think you've put it succinctly.
There used to be a range of VHF/UHF capable satellite rigs but these days the
user seems left to secondhand, huge base station or complex Yaesu menus (with
tiny display). Elecraft could wipe the floor.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24
When I was active on the linear transponders of AO6 through to AO13 I never
used a satellite duplex radio, always separates. We had much better satellites
then, in decent orbits like AO-10. So Yaesu in particular brought out lovely
expensive duplex radios. Great! However then the linear sats gra
But isn't that the point?
The KXn family ARE SDR, with I and Q outputs ready for excellent pandapter
display with the PXn.
Just want VHF/UHF instead of HF and it's all there.
Andy, G8TQH
Sent from my iPhone
> On 25 May 2016, at 09:43, David Anderson via Elecraft
> wrote:
>
> When I was
David,
At 12:43 AM 5/25/2016, David Anderson wrote:
When I was active on the linear transponders of AO6 through to AO13
I never used a satellite duplex radio, always separates. We had much
better satellites then, in decent orbits like AO-10. So Yaesu in
particular brought out lovely expensive
ell.
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:16:38 -0700
From: Phil Wheeler
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
Message-ID: <7f140668-ae11-ec14-9ac4-91a72a13a...@socal.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Ed, re
That is the point yes.
I wasn't saying it wasn't.
Excuse my previous comments which came across as confrontational, they weren't
meant to be and my only excuse is lack of coffee ;-) I was merely outlining my
thoughts which may be in agreement with what has already been said by others.
I use th
d be well received by
>> this segment of ham radio.
>>
>> Would 1,000 ordered the first month be adequate?
>>
>> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>> PS: you would be surprised how many KX3 are in use as IF for VHF and
>> higher bands. KX2 will probably see some of this use a
ll probably see some of this use as well.
>
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:16:38 -0700
> From: Phil Wheeler
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
> Message-ID: <7f140668-ae11-ec14-9ac4-91a72a13a...@socal.rr.com>
dio.
Some day someone will - watch the stampede when that happens!
73, Ed
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
Message-ID: <5745951f.2090...@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
I should be th
Elecraft radios some day for full
cross-band duplex.
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:33:24 + (UTC)
From: Johnny Siu
To: Edward R Cole , David Anderson
Cc: "Elecraft@mailman.qth.net"
Subject: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
Instead of developing a new rad
Seems that this is a strong argument against a "satellite radio" -- if
they launch a new satellite, and it does something different, you might
not have the right bands and/or modes built in.
General purpose UHF/VHF is a different story.
On 5/25/2016 1:43 AM, David Anderson via Elecraft wrote:
, 25 May 2016 11:33:24 + (UTC)
From: Johnny Siu
To: Edward R Cole , David Anderson
Cc: "Elecraft@mailman.qth.net"
Subject: [Elecraft] KX2 Satellite Derivative? (Was: Re: The KX2)
Instead of developing a new radio for SAT. ?Can there be a device that
can link two elecraft r
20 matches
Mail list logo