Re: [Elecraft] Outbacker vs. buddipole etc.

2005-07-02 Thread Michael Babineau
On 2-Jul-05, at 10:47 AM, Paul Gates wrote: Why is it not suited on a deck? Paul Because it relies on capacitive coupling to ground to form the other half of your antenna. It could be used on a deck simply as a mount but then you would have to attach some sort of tuned counterpoise to it.

[Elecraft] Outbacker vs. buddipole etc.

2005-07-01 Thread Ken Miller K6CTW
I'll just add in my 2 cents worth here too. I've been using an Outbacker Perth Plus as a mobile antenna for the past 5+ years and have been VERY satisfied with the results. I run mostly 40 meter CW while I commute but occasionally work 20 CW and even once in a blue moon SSB on 20. The rig is

[Elecraft] Outbacker vs. buddipole etc.

2005-06-30 Thread Erik Linder
Hi all, A bit off topic, apologize for that. I want to have the best performance per cost antenna for my K1 and K2. * The antenna must be portable, but I don't need it to be a mobile antenna. (I dont't drive and work QSO's at the same time) * It must cover 80 - 10 m, but it's not necessary to

Re: [Elecraft] Outbacker vs. buddipole etc.

2005-06-30 Thread Stuart Rohre
Erik, Each of the listed antennas has a good design and application. The Bug Catcher is more a mobile antenna, and needs radials to work portable. It will need a mobile base adapted to a portable stand. The Outbacker is a mobile antenna that now comes with radial kit and stand,but is short for