t; would be an option, since many would not want the clutter.
>
> 73,
> Larry N8LP
>
>
>
> On 11/8/2010 1:00 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:10:50 +
>> From: Barry N1EU
>> Subject: [Elecraft] Panadapters - need for ba
Rex Lint
Merrimack, NH
WWW.QRZ.COM/db/k1hi
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Amateur Radio
Operator N5GE
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:59 AM
To: elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Panadapt
en in beta for quite some time). I'm sure that if it happens, it
would be an option, since many would not want the clutter.
73,
Larry N8LP
On 11/8/2010 1:00 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:10:50 +
> From: Barry N1EU
> Subject: [Elecraft] Pan
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:10:50 +, Barry N1EU wrote:
Software that displays callsign data that I am aware of use clusters (Telnet or
web connections) to get the information displayed. I can see how some software
might record QSO data in a way that would allow the sort of tagging you suggest,
b
It will need more screen real estate than a standalone P3 could offer -
unless the proposed VGA output is actually a vga connector outputting
more than vga resolution. And even then that would require a dedicated
screen in addition to existing computer monitors. This would only be
worth it if t
On 11/08/2010 03:10 PM, Barry N1EU wrote:
> I'm offering this as food for thought. It seems that one important feature
> that panadapters (SDR, LP-PAN, P3, etc) lack is the inability to tag a
> spectral trace with a callsign to mark its identity. For example, check
> this mockup: http://n1eu.com
I'm offering this as food for thought. It seems that one important feature
that panadapters (SDR, LP-PAN, P3, etc) lack is the inability to tag a
spectral trace with a callsign to mark its identity. For example, check
this mockup: http://n1eu.com/bndmp_spec.jpg
If I qsy to a trace I see on a bu
7 matches
Mail list logo
