webmaster: I accidently deleted issues 6 & 7. Would you please re-send them to me? TNX, Ken WA4GHY
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:01 AM Subject: Elecraft Digest, Vol 18, Issue 5 > Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to > elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. N1IH, please contact me (W3FPR - Don Wilhelm) > 2. Top Posting (ps030805) > 3. K7C - Bagged Him (Mark Saunders, KJ7BS) > 4. RE: Top Posting (W3FPR - Don Wilhelm) > 5. Side-posting With Tongue-in-Cheek (Paul Saville) > 6. Re: Top Posting (Fred Jensen) > 7. RE: Top Posting (Paul T. Rubin) > 8. Re: Top Posting (Ian Stirling) > 9. Re: Antenna Modelling software (Dave Sergeant) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:21:26 -0400 > From: "W3FPR - Don Wilhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Elecraft] N1IH, please contact me > To: "Elecraft reflector" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Sorry for the bandwidth folks --- > > Greg (N1IH), > > Please change your email client ot accept international characters and > re-contact me. My posts to you are bouncing because you are rejecting > e-mail in non-Western character sets. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 9/30/2005 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:47:07 +1300 > From: ps030805 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Top Posting > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Perhaps we could compromise > A very good point! > Not only > and _side_ post, but only on > removing the > unneccessary parts > the _left_side_. It's actually > of a message you > reply to is > quite fun, and you can read the > important, it is > also very > original message with your right > important NOT to > reply _atop_ > eye, while simultaneously reading > the original message > but _below_ > the reply with your left eye, > it. It's much easier > to read the > provided you have both eyes open! > message when proper > quiting was > 73, Paul > used, even if one > didn't follow > > the thread closely. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:49:18 -0700 > From: "Mark Saunders, KJ7BS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Elecraft] K7C - Bagged Him > To: "Elecraft Reflector" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > I finally bagged K7C. I caught him as he was starting his session on 30m > this evening. I worked him at 100 watts and switched to QRP and called with > /QRP, but no joy. I tried several more times, but nothing. I may still > work him, yet. > > > > The band went a little strange for a while. I heard NO signals on 40, 30, > 20, or 17 meters. Then a little before 0200 UTC signals started coming up. > Did we have another X class solar flare today? > > > > Mark Saunders, KJ7BS > > Glendale, AZ > > <><><><><><><><><> > > FISTS # 2972 > > Elecraft K2 S/N 539 > > <><><><><><><><><> > > If you aint having fun, > > you aint doing it right. > > AZ ScQRPions > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 00:11:36 -0400 > From: "W3FPR - Don Wilhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Top Posting > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > ps030805 (aka noname, nocall), > > You should 'standardize' the line length before you try side-posting. The > following message is very confusing. > > The key to top posting is to reply in complete, logical sentences - anything > else produces garbage. For those who are not willing to construct responses > in complete sentences, I am not willing and able to to decipher > foreshortened comments (I find most of the bottom or in-line comments are > really just trivial stuff anyway). I ask how many posts have you seen with > no additional comment? I know I have seen at least 5 in the last 3 days - > one scrolls down on a comment in an interesting thread and finds nothing has > been added - what a waste of time and bandwidth - think of those who read > this reflector in digest form. > > 73, > W3FPR > > > -----Original Message----- > > Perhaps we could compromise > A very good point! > > Not only > > and _side_ post, but only on > removing the > > unneccessary parts > > the _left_side_. It's actually > of a message you > > reply to is > > quite fun, and you can read the > important, it is > > also very > > original message with your right > important NOT to > > reply _atop_ > > eye, while simultaneously reading > the original message > > but _below_ > > the reply with your left eye, > it. It's much easier > > to read the > > provided you have both eyes open! > message when proper > > quiting was > > 73, Paul > used, even if one > > didn't follow > > > the thread closely. > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 9/30/2005 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:22:36 +1300 > From: Paul Saville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Side-posting With Tongue-in-Cheek > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > My humble apologies. One certainly mustn't muck-up > one's side-postings. Here's another try... > > Perhaps we could > A very good point! > compromise and > Not only removing > _side_ post, but > the unneccessary > only on the > parts of a message > _left_side_. It's > you reply to is > actually quite fun, > important, it is > and you can read > also very important > the original message > NOT to reply _atop_ > with your right eye, > the original message > while simultaneously > but _below_it. It's > reading the reply > much easier to read > with your left eye, > the message when > provided you have > proper quiting was > both eyes open! > used, even if one > 73, Paul ZL3IN > didn't follow > > the thread closely. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:48:55 -0700 > From: Fred Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Top Posting > To: Elecraft Reflector <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > OK guys and gals, this is getting very close to the neverending > discussion of which way the toilet paper should roll. The PS030805 post > is ingenious and creative, except it didn't format well for me, as you > can see below, which I've truncated for bandwidth (and sanity) > preservation. It may format even worse the second time around. Since > I'm sure it was tongue-in-cheek, I don't think Paul will mind. > > ps030805 wrote: > <enough> > > Perhaps we could compromise > A very good point! > > Not only > > and _side_ post, but only on > removing the > > unneccessary parts > > the _left_side_. It's actually > of a message you > > reply to is > > quite fun, and you can read the > important, it is > > also very > > original message with your right > important NOT to > > reply _atop_ > > eye, while simultaneously reading > the original message > > but _below_ > </okenough> > > Fred K6DGW > Auburn CA CM98lw > > Thanks to all for the contacts in the CQP. I was at N6A in Alpine > County on CW. Almost got blown off the mountain, but we did manage > 1,152 unaudited QSO's. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:57:27 -0500 > From: "Paul T. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Top Posting > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Elecraft Reflector'" > <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > >OK guys and gals, this is getting very close to the neverending > discussion of which way the toilet paper should roll. > > > It rolls clockwise in the northern hemisphere. > > (Sorry folks, I just couldn't resist.) > > Paul N8NOV > Houston (Northern Hemisphere) > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 05:07:07 +0000 > From: Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Top Posting > To: Elecraft Reflector <elecraft@mailman.qth.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:11, W3FPR - Don Wilhelm wrote: > > > You should 'standardize' the line length before you try side-posting. The > > following message is very confusing. > > The problem is that 'word processor' techniques > are prevalent in email these days, even if the > email is plain text. People just type and let > their local line wrap make it seem as if it's > formatted. > The worst comes when someone with a line wrap > in their sending software wraps a quote that was > properly formatted by the original sender. > There's nothing to do about advancing lowering > of standards and etiquette - it's just entropy. > > Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 4962 > -- > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 07:18:05 +0100 > From: "Dave Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Re: Antenna Modelling software > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On 3 Oct 2005 at 23:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have not done this for sometime. Anyone know where I can download a > > trial/free version of antenna modeling software. I have my eye on a > > tall tree in the yard. > > > > Jess AE0CW > > Without doubt: > > MMANA http://mmhamsoft.ham-radio.ch/ > > Free and excellent. > > 73 Dave G3YMC > > http://www.davesergeant.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > You must be a subscriber to post. > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 18, Issue 5 > *************************************** _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
