Re: [Elecraft] Re? K3 TXCO

2009-10-26 Thread Radio Amateur N5GE
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:27:48 -0400, Don Wilhelm wrote: >I see that we are mixing terms in this thread. *Stability* and >*Accuracy* are two different things, and one does not imply the other. >Those expecting better *accuracy* with the addition of software >compensation may be dissapointed (

Re: [Elecraft] Re? K3 TXCO

2009-10-26 Thread Don Wilhelm
I see that we are mixing terms in this thread. *Stability* and *Accuracy* are two different things, and one does not imply the other. Those expecting better *accuracy* with the addition of software compensation may be dissapointed (read on for more info). The high stability TCXO will not ne

Re: [Elecraft] Re： K3 TXCO

2009-10-26 Thread Brett Howard
No because the TCXO you bought is what provides you with the higher accuracy. Its just that additional firmware correction isn't needed to meet 0.5PPM because the TCXO is that good out of the box. ~BTH On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:09 +0800, Johnny Siu wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Fine, correct, you are

Re: [Elecraft] Re? K3 TXCO

2009-10-25 Thread Radio Amateur N5GE
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:09:56 +0800 (HKT), Johnny Siu wrote: >Hello Joe, >  >Fine, correct, you are right.  Then I should now have the liberty to return my >TXCO to Elecraft and ask for a refund because all I needed is the advertised >stability and nothing extra. >  >It is nothing wrong with Gar

[Elecraft] Re： K3 TXCO

2009-10-25 Thread Johnny Siu
Hello Joe,   Fine, correct, you are right.  Then I should now have the liberty to return my TXCO to Elecraft and ask for a refund because all I needed is the advertised stability and nothing extra.   It is nothing wrong with Gary who has his point because he was not given the chance to make his