-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Exactly!
It continues today.
A couple weeks ago there was a dust up on the list about "Variable Q"
for the APF filter. Can you imagine what's going to happen the first
time someone actually starts monkeying around with that and can't get it
set back
I recall someone on this list predicting this behaviour and said that he
used a tx shift of 50Hz so that he stood out from the crowd to get in first
shout.
David
G3UNA
Guy Olinger said:
It's not NEARLY on frequency. It's EXACTLY ON FREQUENCY. I know what
I'm hearing. I can hear a hertz in
In this particular case, and pretty much only this case, which is NOT
detectable by the tx control operator, is the ONLY
situation that key clicks may be of some assist to the rx operator, and how
much help the clicks are will depend
entirely upon the experience of the operator, AND the conditi
I believe the parameters were that people hearing a diff at 3 dB were
the first statistically significant group, and half/most at 6 dB. And
this was a defined task without distractions. Would guess that same
on a noisy 160m is more difficult, yes.
73, Guy.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Barry
t: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:22 AM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommended AGC settings for separation
> of signalsin CW pile-ups
>
> Oh well,I don't like to argue anybody or disagree anybody but I
> was at the contest as well and and I could ea
Guy, K2AV wrote:
>
> Or stated differently, your ear probably needs something an S-unit
> difference to discern two signals exactly on frequency with no other
> separation information in the signal blend.
>
My experience, which seems to be shared by several others, is that even
signals of grea
Dave,
The signals can be separated by amplitude if you set the AGC slope
correctly - unfortunately, that is not the default settings.
See the article dealing with the K3 AGC on my website www.w3fpr.com.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 12/5/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Hachadorian wrote:
> This thread is not about co
ctor Padron
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:22 AM
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommended AGC settings for separation
> of signalsin CW pile-ups
>
> Oh well,I don't like to argue anybody or disagree anybody but I
> was at the contest as well
I'm one of the biggest proponents of AGC Off on the K3, but I honestly don't
find that it helps much with multiple nearly-on-frequency callers. It helps
greatly with relief from AGC riding by neighboring key clickers, but not so
much with sorting out the nearly-on-frequency pileups. That just se
adron
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:22 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommended AGC settings for separation
of signalsin CW pile-ups
Oh well,I don't like to argue anybody or disagree anybody but I
was at the contest as well and and I could easily separate CW
sta
10 matches
Mail list logo
