On Jun 10, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Lyle Johnson wrote:
So "memory" is not the same thing to all people.
You make a very good point, and I suspect that you are right. Which
means
that there is no "one size fits all" solution. The end result in
software
tends to be programs with so many user defi
If anybody wants my K2 control program for EMACS please let me know.
I haven't updated it for the K3 additional features yet.
Leigh PA/WA5ZNU
Ham since 1969, EMACS user since 1979.
> aka EMACS, as in "The EMACS effect."
>
> 73,
>
> Lyle KK7P
>
___
Elecraf
So "memory" is not the same thing to all people.
You make a very good point, and I suspect that you are right. Which means
that there is no "one size fits all" solution. The end result in software
tends to be programs with so many user definable settings you need to go on
a course just to find o
Brian Lloyd-6 wrote:
>
> Has anyone defined what the semantics are for a memory location?
>
> ...
>
> So "memory" is not the same thing to all people.
>
You make a very good point, and I suspect that you are right. Which means
that there is no "one size fits all" solution. The end result in
Has anyone defined what the semantics are for a memory location? Are
you using it as a preset for certain values or are you using it to
change the state of the radio? I know that when I set a memory for a
radio I want all of the current state to go into that memory location.
That would incl
Absolutely!
This is getting ridiculous.
How about if we have the rig turn down the bed and put a mint on the
pillow as well?
G4ILO wrote:
Lennart Michaƫlsson wrote:
Jerry/N8BM said:
Might it be a good idea to allow the storage and then recall of the
power level in those memories on a per
Joe Planisky wrote:
>
> I had the same thought when I first read the proposal, Julian. Plus I
> can see how including a power level in the memory might cause the very
> problem Jerry is trying to prevent. If I normally don't use an amp on
> a certain band but forget that I had the amp in
I had the same thought when I first read the proposal, Julian. Plus I
can see how including a power level in the memory might cause the very
problem Jerry is trying to prevent. If I normally don't use an amp on
a certain band but forget that I had the amp in line and call up the
'full pow
Lennart Michaƫlsson wrote:
>
> Jerry/N8BM said:
>
> Might it be a good idea to allow the storage and then recall of the
> power level in those memories on a per band basis? Personally I would
> like to store a power level appropriate for driving my amp on each band.
> So when I select a partic
9 matches
Mail list logo