That is exactly right. And it is not a fault only of ARRL. You never
read a harsh review in RSGB RadCom or Practical Wireless over here
either. PW reviews are a total waste of time as they are completely
subjective.
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Good idea, I tried 2 years ago with the K2.
Stewart G3RXQ
Carefully steering clear of Airplane trap.
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:59:01 +0200, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
I expect he will be interested - with any luck he'll be at the RSGB HF
convention, I'll ask him about this.
Shirley someone
Rob Sherwood gave his permission to post this on the
FT-2000 list. Since that is public information I am posting
it here also. BTW I agree with his comments on the new
methodology.
73, Bill W4ZV
What has gone wrong with the ARRL's new Product
waveBill
thanks for your input..really appreciated...
de
Wp4o, Ed
- Original Message -
From: Bill Tippett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Sherwood on ARRL Testing Methodology (LONG!)
Rob Sherwood
When will the day come when the information in QST is more than a
fluff review, and a free multi-page advertisement for the manufacturer?
When the magazine publishing costs are not paid for by the advertisers?
I can't wait to compare the K3 with my 2000 and 1000MP.
Mike W0MU
Sent using the
Ouch - I would say he nailed it! I have serious issues with the AGC as
handled by the Orion's DSP.
What will the K3 offer?
k4ia
Craig Buck
Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
