Re: [Elecraft] Substitution of stock 2.7 for the 2.8 in the K3

2007-12-06 Thread Dave Yarnes
! Dave W7AQK - Original Message - From: Alan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Substitution of stock 2.7 for the 2.8 in the K3 I suspect you would be hard-pressed to see

[Elecraft] Substitution of stock 2.7 for the 2.8

2007-12-05 Thread Bob
I am looking for a consensus as to the value of switching the stock 2.7Khz for the 2.8Khz filter at time of order and paying the difference based on a $30 credit? I would like some input as to what the difference really is and what it would mean in terms of functionality. Additionally, if the 2.8

Re: [Elecraft] Substitution of stock 2.7 for the 2.8

2007-12-05 Thread Matt Zilmer
One man's simple answer is ... well .. simple. Keep the 2.7KHz 5-p filter. You will find that the DSP provides mighty fine ultimate rejection. In this configuration, the 2.7 filter provides quite adequate protection from strong in-band signals. If you're a contester, buy one or both of the 1.8

Re: [Elecraft] Substitution of stock 2.7 for the 2.8 in the K3

2007-12-05 Thread Alan Bloom
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 20:15, Bob wrote: I am looking for a consensus as to the value of switching the stock 2.7Khz for the 2.8Khz filter at time of order and paying the difference based on a $30 credit? I would like some input as to what the difference really is and what it would mean in terms