The 200W version has a low range that can measure power down to 0.1
watt. The minimum reading on the 2000W version is 1 watt.
On 5 Jan 2015 10:12, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
I would have thought there is some difference, otherwise why go to the trouble
of making two different models?
-73
I would have thought there is some difference, otherwise why go to the trouble
of making two different models?
-73 de M0XDF
> On 4 Jan 2015, at 20:01, Michael Eberle wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> With the 2000 watt coupler, you can still select either the 20 watt, 200
> watt, or 2000 watt scales. I d
Dan,
With the 2000 watt coupler, you can still select either the 20 watt, 200
watt, or 2000 watt scales. I doubt there would be any difference in
resolution by using the 2000 watt coupler with the W2 set for the 200
watt scale. The manual specifies accuracy of +/- 0.5 dB typical for
both se
On 1/3/2015 7:31 AM, kg5eju wrote:
> But, wondering if there is some accuracy/performance trade-off using a 2000
> watt coupler on a 100 watt station?
The FCC's standard for transmitter metering is the minimum normal
reading cannot be less than 20% of the full scale reading for a
linear-scale i
100 Watt station with 2 antenna. Need a second coupler of the W2. First one
is 200 watt, and thinking of adding a 2000 watt coupler for the second (future
proofing for possible linear). But, wondering if there is some
accuracy/performance trade-off using a 2000 watt coupler on a 100 watt stat
5 matches
Mail list logo
