On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:32:42 -0800 (PST), Bill W4ZV wrote:
http://www.audioholics.com/education/acoustics-principles/human-hearing-
amplitude-sensitivity-part-1
In Table 1 we see a collection of studies spanning 60 years. It should be
kept in mind that in each case the results were obtained
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
...we are working on the signal to noise ratio, NOT LOUDNESS. It's apples and
oranges! The only thing in common is that we're using a log ratio to
describe it.
I couldn't agree more with Jim on this one. In our business, we are trying
to
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:14 -0800, Kok Chen wrote:
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
...we are working on the signal to noise ratio, NOT LOUDNESS. It's apples
and
oranges! The only thing in common is that we're using a log ratio to
describe it.
I couldn't agree more
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:23:27 -0800, Alan Bloom wrote:
So I think the bottom line is that 1 dB would make no discernable
difference in casual operation.
Strongly agree.
But for someone contesting at the
highest levels. that is, someone who has a serious chance of winning a
CQWW or a
[END of Thread (and all other related dB, 100-150-200w threads)]
Guys - Thought I ended this thread several days ago. Let's end it again
now as we are beating it to death. :-)
Must be a slow news day. (or no sun spots!)
73, Eric WA6HHQ
elecraft moderator
Jim Brown wrote:
On Tue, 15
On the other-other hand, even if 1 dB made the difference in only one
contact in a thousand, that might be very important to a world-class
contester. At that level of competition, a 0.1% increase in contacts
could be the difference between winning and losing.
What you suggest sounds good,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:20:36 -0500, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
It's far easier to be loud. But RX is what wins contests.
It's certainly very important, but I don't think it's either-or,
it's both. I know that my Beverages have made me a lot of Qs. Last
night, I was trying to work ON4 on 160M. He
7 matches
Mail list logo
