Yeah, I misread the rule. I thought the rule was saying a dipole was 0 dbi,
not 0 dBd! Didn't make sense to me.
Gus, KB0YH also caught my mistake.
Tnx for un-kinking my brain Guys!
73,
Ron
-Original Message-
Ron,
The FCC regulations for 60 meter power is referenced to the maximum
...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ron
> D'Eau Claire
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:32 PM
> To: d...@w3fpr.com
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: [Elecraft] dBi dBd correction
>
>
> Yeah, I misread the rule. I thought the rule was saying a
> dipole wa
free space gain or 8.17 dBi (1.25 + 6.02).
>
> 73,
>
>... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Ron
>> D'Eau Claire
>&
Guy, K2AV wrote:
> The way the regulation reads, hams are being told they can put 50 watts PEP
> on an antenna, up to the gain of a dipole, and call that 50 watts ERP.
> Higher gain must be referenced to the dipole and the 50 watts reduced
> accordingly.
>
> For mobile stations there is no mentio
To: Guy, K2AV
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] dBi dBd correction
Guy, K2AV wrote:
> The way the regulation reads, hams are being told they can put 50 watts PEP
> on an antenna, up to the gain of a dipole, and call that 50 watts ERP.
> Higher gain must be
> The reg is the reg,
Absolutely! So let's read the reg and see what it says. Most arguments about
the rules can be resolved quickly by doing this. When reading regulations,
contracts, or other legalese, it's important not to read between the lines
or "interpret." Read exactly what the words say
2AV wrote:
> From: Guy, K2AV
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] dBi dBd correction
> To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 7:30 PM
> ARRL ain't the FCC. And the ARRL's opinion is no
> mitigation whatsoever if I get an FCC pink slip. The reg is
> the reg, a
7 matches
Mail list logo
