...@embarqmail.com
To: fo...@foxjazz.net
CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; g...@elecraft.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] k2 pll and ref osc issues n0xdb
Foxjazz,
(Eric may chastise me for this post because he, not I, is the list
policeman, but I will do it anyway).
OK, I have learned from
Joseph,
Since you have a good frequency reading at TP3, the PLL Reference
Oscillator is working, and the problem is in the area of Q18. So we
move the problem area on the schematic to the upper right corner of the
RF Board schematic sheet 1.
Note that the VFO output goes through U3 before it
I concur. It's not kosher under any circumstances to post someone else's
personal information without their permission. Security isn't a trivial
matter on the Internet these days.
73,
LS
W5QD
--
View this message in context:
Do note that Foxjazz himself included his call in the subject line
of the post that started this thread. Not the usual place to be sure,
but I doubt his intention in doing so was to remain anonymous.
73
--
Joe KB8AP
On Apr 17, 2010, at 11:58 PM, The Smiths wrote:
For you to not only give
It doesn't matter - it's 100% improper to post personal information for
someone else, even if that information is obtainable elsewhere. It's up to
N0XDB to post his/her name if he/she so chooses, not Don or anyone else.
As I said, personal privacy isn't a trivial matter, particularly these days.
No personal information was posted, it was only publically available
information easily obtained from QRZ.com, and also in the FCC database.
I don't see that a name and call are personal information
However, it won't happen again. If anyone wants my assistance, it will
have to be by direct
This is Elecraft's forum and they have the ultimate switch on these
things. Having said that, just to straighten up an injustice
here
Name and call sign is not personal information, it is a matter of public record
There is no expectation of anonymity on this reflector. This IS a HAM
Hi,
That would be a real shame, Don, if you were to leave the reflector. Your
postings have always been extremely helpful. Personally I am highly
suspicious of anonymous postings on ham forums. As licensed hams there is no
way for us to hide as we have it all hanging out on FCC's web site. Most
Nice going Guys!!You just killed the goose that lays the golden
eggs.
I know where Don is coming from. I got chastised for publishing a link
to QRZ on a car
collector forum. The call sign was in an e-mail and I also outed that
person.
BS... It is public information as was given.
All
Sorry I caused a ruckus. I understand where everyone comes from. Again
my call was in the subject line GO FIGURE.
I don't care one way or the other if Don leaves the reflector.
Elecraft has a reputation for support, unfortunately they aren't open
on weekends when I get to troubleshoot my
You probably should have stuck to your Cobra 29
As for getting help on the weekends...NOT
without Don !
Have a great day:Jerry N0JRN
On 4/18/2010 12:47:20 PM, Foxjazz (fo...@foxjazz.net) wrote:
All
Sorry I caused a ruckus. I understand where everyone comes
I'll stop pouring gas on this after this post, but to reiterate a few things:
Name and call sign is not personal information, it is a matter of public
record
It's the principle involved, not the happenstance that Don simply printed
something about this person that's a matter of public record.
Hello n0jrn,
DON'T BE STUPID AND BLAME ME FOR DON NOT READING THE SUBJECT OF THE
EMAIL.
--
mailto:fo...@foxjazz.net
Sunday, April 18, 2010, 12:00:32 PM, you wrote:
You probably should have stuck to your Cobra 29
As for getting help on the weekends...NOT
without Don !
Have a
...@foxjazz.net
CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; g...@elecraft.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] k2 pll and ref osc issues n0xdb
Foxjazz,
(Eric may chastise me for this post because he, not I, is the list
policeman, but I will do it anyway).
OK, I have learned from another ham here
Hello Elecraft,
Hello Don,
I had the pll working before I did phase 3 and put the ssb board in.
It was working great, now it isn't. I thought I would run a quick
voltage test before continuing. Now the pll freq is 0.000
I reviewed the test results and re-tinned T5 just to ensure
Foxjazz,
Do you have a real name and a call? We here on the Elecraft reflector
certainly would like to know if you do.
Q6 on what board has the bad resistance reading? The Q6 on the RF board
has nothing to do with your PLL problem.
Is it at TP3 that you are getting a reading of 0.00 kHz?
Foxjazz,
(Eric may chastise me for this post because he, not I, is the list
policeman, but I will do it anyway).
OK, I have learned from another ham here on the reflector that you do
have a call and I looked up your name on QRZ.com. N0XDB - Joseph T.
Dickerson III.
Would you please use it on
Hello Don,
Don, the call was in the subject line.
Sorry for the confusion. I had the pll circuit working great with all
alignments before starting on phase 3 and putting the ssb board in.
As far as checking parts, the parts were correct when I checked them
the second time, and the pll circuit
Hello Don,
Also I forgot to mention again (I think I did in first post) that tp1
reads 0. freq.
freq probe.
pin 4 on t5 reads the same.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
19 matches
Mail list logo
