Elecrafters,
Another tool that I have used sometime to suppliment
the Spectrogram program is the waterfall display of
Digipan (or any of the similar PSK31 programs). For
example, the waterfall display shows the time
dependence of the WWV components making it easy to
identify the carrier (center ban
Rick wrote:
>>Of course the audible zero-beat method works
>> fine too, but there is always the possibility of confusion about whether
>> one is zeroing the carrier or one of the transmitted tones.
I haven't had a problem with the WWV tones. I first zero on WWV, then wait
for the announcement th
David Wilburn wrote:
I have had a great deal up success using Spectrogram as Don describes.
This page is very helpful for understanding what goes on, minute by
minute, with the WWV signal.
http://tf.nist.gov/stations/iform.html
-
I consider the above method more accurate than using a fr
I have had a great deal up success using Spectrogram as Don describes.
This page is very helpful for understanding what goes on, minute by
minute, with the WWV signal.
http://tf.nist.gov/stations/iform.html
-
David Wilburn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K4DGW
K2 S/N 5982
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 18:32 -0500
Cary,
500 Hz high? Now that sounds like you did the zero beat correctly, but
at one of the WWV tones rather than the carrier. I suggest you try
again. If you want to try an alternate to audible zero-beat, see below
- there will be no confusion about whether you are zero beating a WWV
tone
Hi Cary,
> I hesitate to put this question on the reflector
This what the reflector is for!
> apparently my signal is about 500 hertz higher
You ought to double check which filters you have set up for TX for each
mode. It sounds to me as if you might have a small fubar in your filter
setti
6 matches
Mail list logo
