Johnny,
Twisted pair is just as effective as coax, and easier to work with. I
am not certain that was the reason for that design, but there is no
problem with it.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 9/8/2011 1:53 AM, Johnny Siu wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> The connection between the RF deck to the RF SO239 outp
On 9/7/2011 10:53 PM, Johnny Siu wrote:
> The connection between the RF deck to the RF SO239 output is a pair of
> twisted wires instead of a coaxial jumper. Is there any reason for such a
> design?
Sure. Twisted pair is a VERY effective transmission line, and that is
what is needed. In fact,
> On 9/7/2011 10:53 PM, Johnny Siu wrote:
>> The connection between the RF deck to the RF SO239 output is a pair
>> of twisted wires instead of a coaxial jumper. Is there any reason
>> for such a design?
Twisted pair is a highly effective transmission line, and easier to work
with than coax
> Sure. Twisted pair is a VERY effective transmission line, and that is
> what is needed ...
Hey Jim, what kind of twisted pair could I use to feed my [mostly 50 ohm] HF
antennas? Coax is expensive in ZL so I'm willing to try alternatives. I'm
even thinking of homebrew balanced line with baluns
On 9/10/2011 11:05 PM, Gary Hinson wrote:
>> Sure. Twisted pair is a VERY effective transmission line, and that is
>> what is needed ...
> Hey Jim, what kind of twisted pair could I use to feed my [mostly 50 ohm] HF
> antennas? Coax is expensive in ZL so I'm willing to try alternatives. I'm
> eve
5 matches
Mail list logo