I have upgraded to every firmware beta and never had a problem.
David Wilburn
K4DGW
BOB PHILBROOK wrote:
After reading countless reflector comments about firmware upgrades and releases, it appears to me that in many instances such so called upgrades are two steps forward and one in reverse.
Lyle Johnson wrote:
>
>> Set the PWR control to 100w (or 120w if you wish) and control the power
>> output using the MIC level control on the front panel. (MIC SEL = LINE
>> IN).
>> Or is that classed as cheating? :-)
>
> Yes, I think it is :-)
>
> The problem with this approach is that over
The K3 operating tip regarding PSK setup:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/k3_operating_tips.htm#psk%20audio
really does need to be updated. It was written before the ALC system
changes that came with MCU 1.87.
Bob NW8L
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Lyle Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Set t
Set the PWR control to 100w (or 120w if you wish) and control the power
output using the MIC level control on the front panel. (MIC SEL = LINE IN).
Or is that classed as cheating? :-)
Yes, I think it is :-)
The problem with this approach is that over time the slow ALC loop may
try to build the
Dave G4AON wrote:
>
>
> There are still issues to be resolved, one I would like fixed is the
> inability to adjust power while transmitting data which is tedious.
> There are published items on the "to be implemented" list such as the
> TCXO calibration to 0.5ppm.
>
>
I hope I'm not missi
Having already survived the Ten-Tec Orion I firmware and hardware
upgrade fiasco, I must admit that my experiences with the Elecraft
firmware migration has been a real pleasure. I eagerly download each new
beta version as soon as I know it's available. I have never regressed to
a previous editi
6 matches
Mail list logo
