Abd ul-Rahman Lomax Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 5:28 AM
James Gilmour wrote:
What I had in mind was if I vote 1, 2, 3, 4 (1 = most preferred, the
one I want to see win) for candidates A, B, C, D,
and you vote 100, 99, 2, 1 (1 = most preferred) for the same four
candidates, it would
Reply to Venzke Gilmour about Social Utility
Gilmour Venzke have again expressed the opinion that Social Utility is merely
yet another voting system criterion, on a par with
Monotonicity, Favorite Betrayal, Condorcet, etc, and therefore my preference for
it is unwarranted, mysterious, biased,
Warren,
--- Warren Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Reply to Venzke Gilmour about Social Utility
Gilmour Venzke have again expressed the opinion that Social Utility is
merely
yet another voting system criterion, on a par with
Monotonicity, Favorite Betrayal, Condorcet, etc, and
