Jan Kok Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:07 AM
Yes, I agree that the election rules affect how people vote.
But, unsophisticated IRV supporters are not aware that there
can be incentives to vote insincerely in IRV elections, or
may believe that IRV and Condorcet will always, or almost
James Gilmour wrote:
Jan Kok Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:07 AM
Yes, I agree that the election rules affect how people vote.
But, unsophisticated IRV supporters are not aware that there
can be incentives to vote insincerely in IRV elections, or
may believe that IRV and Condorcet will
Eric Gorr Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:31 PM
James Gilmour wrote:
Jan Kok Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:07 AM
Yes, I agree that the election rules affect how people vote.
But, unsophisticated IRV supporters are not aware that there
can be incentives to vote insincerely in IRV
Quoting James Gilmour [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eric Gorr Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:31 PM
James Gilmour wrote:
Jan Kok Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:07 AM
Yes, I agree that the election rules affect how people vote.
But, unsophisticated IRV supporters are not aware that there
can be
At 9:06 PM -0700 3/12/06, Jan Kok wrote:
When I counted Kiss vs. Miller 4755 to 3988, I didn't
count any of the Kiss=Miller votes. I just now checked one of my
intermediate data files and saw that there were 13 ballots that ranked
Kiss=Miller(=others sometimes). If you want to give each 1/2
Dear Jan,
I saw your post on the Elections Methods
List. As a Vermont legislator, we may have to decide the issue of IRV on a
statewide basis.To be honest, I'm not very enthusiastic about
IRV. I would prefer to support the candidate (not plural) of my choice,
and if a runoff must occur
At 11:25 PM -0800 3/10/06, Rob LeGrand wrote:
I took the raw data from the site Brian Olson posted and ended up with a
slightly different pairwise table:
(0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(0)- 5545 6747 3991 6790 7336
(1) 3556- 5165 3397 5136 5875
(2) 1161 1289- 804 2028 3290
(3)
At 11:28 AM -0500 3/12/06, radio deli wrote:
I saw your post on the Elections Methods List. As a Vermont
legislator, we may have to decide the issue of IRV on a statewide
basis. To be honest, I'm not very enthusiastic about IRV. I would
prefer to support the candidate (not plural) of my
BTW - it took more than a day for EM to pass this on to where I could see it.
Delighted to have a Rep. take an interest - too much of the time all that
happens here is debate as to theory.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:28:48 -0500 radio deli wrote:
Dear Jan,
I saw your post on the Elections