At 01:06 AM 4/27/2006, Dave Ketchum wrote:
It appears that the Constitution allows just about any method of
choosing electors that a state wishes to follow: this, indeed, is
the source of the problem, for it led inevitably to all-or-nothing,
since that benefited the majority party in each
At 01:44 AM 4/27/2006, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Now disagreed:
Who is third in a state could be a serious contender in others.
Absolutely.
EVs for a minor candidate COULD be pledged as to who to vote for if
their primary candidate lost.
Yes. Or, alternatively, if it is the electors
Dave K wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:06:00 -0700 Steve Eppley wrote:
Dave K wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 16:18:06 -0700 Steve Eppley wrote:
-snip-
Third, I'm curious how one can distinguish between these two cases:
1.1 A candidate has a safe lock on some state, and therefore
does
