Trying clarification for RRT:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:28:44 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about instant pairwise voting (IPV) as a good
> descriptive name for Condorcet? I'm just throwing
> this out, not advocating it. It apparently hasn't been
> used much, because a Google search resulted in
Following Ralph's suggestion, I created a CIVS poll with various names
that have been proposed on this list for Condorcet voting. The poll also
allows write-ins. Because late write-ins are at a disadvantage, I ask
that people not start casting real votes until 5pm EDT tomorrow, to give
people a
How about instant pairwise voting (IPV) as a good
descriptive name for Condorcet? I'm just throwing
this out, not advocating it. It apparently hasn't been
used much, because a Google search resulted in
no hits. So that would be one drawback, though I
think a minor one. Its big advantage is that IPV
I can't believe I missed such a massive flaw...Coming up with an approval-range method not vulnerable to vote management is difficult.
For electing a candidate, we consume an amount of voting power
from the people who had such a candidate marked by V/ N + 1 (the
Bischoff quota) (where V is your def
