On Oct 14, 2006, at 5:30 , Dave Ketchum wrote:
Is it compatible with Condorcet? I remain a backer for Condorcet's
combining capability with tolerable complexity.
I think yes, but unfortunately it is more difficult to serve
Condorcet than e.g. plurality (one has to trade a bit with
I doubt anyone has what could be described as a comprehensive list of methods.
Your words about 99th and 100th makes me wonder about your understanding.
You should pretty much start with an array, one line and one column for
each candidate. You must provide for expanding the array if
