--- Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> While it is already true that Range and Approval *do*
> satisfy that Criterion, in my opinion, on the argument that the
> majority has consented to a different outcome,
"Majority criterion" has a specific meaning. It in effect says that a
m
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax writes:
> At 07:57 AM 2/28/2007, Michael Poole wrote:
>> > Aggregating utilities, however, is obviously not such a simple thing.
>> > But we should not let this distract us from the fact that utility
>> > analysis is really the *only* approach to judging how well election
>> >
At 07:57 AM 2/28/2007, Michael Poole wrote:
> > Aggregating utilities, however, is obviously not such a simple thing.
> > But we should not let this distract us from the fact that utility
> > analysis is really the *only* approach to judging how well election
> > methods perform, it is not like we
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax writes:
> How to define individual utility in election methods is not
> necessarily a problem: the voter defines it. They system provides a
> means to express such utilities.
>
> Aggregating utilities, however, is obviously not such a simple thing.
> But we should not let th
