Re: [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems

2007-05-04 Thread Michael Poole
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax writes: > At 11:01 PM 5/4/2007, Paul Kislanko wrote: >>This is the kind of post that adds nothing to the EM debate. > > This is the kind of mistake we all make when we don't get enough sleep. > > Below is the remainder of the post from Mr. Kislanko quoting Mr. > Smith's post.

Re: [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems

2007-05-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 11:01 PM 5/4/2007, Paul Kislanko wrote: >This is the kind of post that adds nothing to the EM debate. This is the kind of mistake we all make when we don't get enough sleep. Below is the remainder of the post from Mr. Kislanko quoting Mr. Smith's post. But incompletely. One line is missing. T

Re: [EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems

2007-05-04 Thread Paul Kislanko
This is the kind of post that adds nothing to the EM debate. There's no "theorems about 'point runoff' systems" in the link that's all in the post. Go to the link, and try to find a "theorem" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Sm

[EM] theorems about "point runoff" systems

2007-05-04 Thread Warren Smith
http://rangevoting.org/PointRunoff.html Warren D. Smith http://rangevoting.org election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info