[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few days ago, we had the Republican debates on TV, and I came to the
conclusion that having ten people on the stage at once was an unmanageable
mess. At thirty seconds per answer, candidates were limited to faux anger
and soundbites, while the cheers and applause
On May 22, 2007, at 16:41 , Howard Swerdfeger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few days ago, we had the Republican debates on TV, and I came to
the
conclusion that having ten people on the stage at once was an
unmanageable
mess. At thirty seconds per answer, candidates were limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is often possible effect who actually votes elections by selecting when
the voting occurs. For example, the general election in Ireland is being held
on Thursday.
However, university exams are being held at the moment. This means that
students are much
Interesting idea. 10 people on stage is to many. but 45 pair wise
debates it a lot for the public to watch.
Perhaps there is a good middle ground say, 4-5 people on stage at
once.
and try to make sure that each candidate faces each candidate on
stage once.
There could be different
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:01:51 -0400
From: Chris Backert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EM] HR811 and Federal paper trail legislation
To: election-methods@electorama.com
The House will soon consider a bill introduced by Rep. Rush D. Holt (D-N.J.)
that aims to make all ballots
I came across this:
http://lists.electorama.com/htdig.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com/2002-December/008919.html
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:28:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Forest Simmons mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Candidate Proxy Methods
Dear [his correspondent, and he
