Re: [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid

2007-05-27 Thread Jonathan Lundell
On May 27, 2007, at 7:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was thinking about Meek's method and the possibility of combing > it with approval. > > There doesn't seem to be a definition of Meek's method on the > wikipedia. Does it already allow equal rankings ? > I haven't seen an equal-ranki

Re: [EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid

2007-05-27 Thread James Gilmour
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 27 May 2007 15:55 > > I was thinking about Meek's method and the possibility of > combing it with approval. > > There doesn't seem to be a definition of Meek's method on the > wikipedia. Does it already allow equal rankings ? You'll find an algorithmic description o

[EM] Confirmed advice for readers disturbed by my posts.

2007-05-27 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
SUMMARY: if you find a writer tedious and useless to read, don't read him! Instead, skip his posts, or even set an email filter so they go into the trash, or, if you want to be able to go back if it turns out that a post was important, into a "Not read, discard after a period" folder. I've done

[EM] Meek's Method/approval hybrid

2007-05-27 Thread raphfrk
I was thinking about Meek's method and the possibility of combing it with approval. There doesn't seem to be a definition of Meek's method on the wikipedia.? Does it already allow equal rankings ? Anyway, based on my understanding of how it works, what about this method that combines it with