The definition of plurality criterion is a bit confusing. (I don't
claim that the name and content and intention are very natural
either :-).)
- http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Plurality_criterion talks about
candidates given any preference
- Chris refers to above-bottom preference votes
I'd said:
But if we're going to have the added definition-wordiness of Condorcet,
we should get what Condorcet can offer, including compliance with the
Plurality Criterion, SFC, GSFC, and SDSC, and URNEC.
Juho replied:
And maybe [will you provide] pointers to the definitions of these
Michael Ossipoff wrote:
In a posting to a different mailing list, Markus pointed out that margins
fails the Plurality Criterion, and that wv Condorcet passes the Plurality
Criterion.
Yes.
11: AB
07: B
12: C
A Woodall example that applies. Margins elects A, yet C has more top
preference
Juho--
In a posting to a different mailing list, Markus pointed out that margins
fails the Plurality Criterion, and that wv Condorcet passes the Plurality
Criterion.
For me, Plurality isn't essential. For instance, I consider MDDA a good
proposal.
But if we're going to have the added
