On Feb 24, 2007, at 2:22 , James Gilmour wrote:
Juho> Sent: 22 February 2007 06:29
On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:50 , Dave Ketchum wrote:
STAY AWAY from US Presidential elections. The Electoral College
offers too many complications to live with for this effort.
Ok, let it be UK then, electing a MP
Juho> Sent: 22 February 2007 06:29
> On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:50 , Dave Ketchum wrote:
> > STAY AWAY from US Presidential elections. The Electoral College
> > offers too many complications to live with for this effort.
>
> Ok, let it be UK then, electing a MP (excluding at least the
> Scottish Pa
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:28:40 +0200 Juho wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:50 , Dave Ketchum wrote:
>
>>STAY AWAY from US Presidential elections. The Electoral College
>>offers too many complications to live with for this effort.
>
>
> Ok, let it be UK then, electing a MP (excluding at least the
On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:50 , Dave Ketchum wrote:
> STAY AWAY from US Presidential elections. The Electoral College
> offers too many complications to live with for this effort.
Ok, let it be UK then, electing a MP (excluding at least the Scottish
Parliament to stay in the two-party domain). :-)
Let us see:
Name of method - needs salability, but has no effect on quality of
method.
wv vs margins - a major decision, but either is equally doable. The
Condorcet array should be available anyway, and can be used either way.
Anyone can pick the winner from the above data.
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:53 , Michael Ossipoff wrote:
> Juho replies:
>
> Do you mean that margins would be so "strategy inviting" that most
> voters would turn to strategic voters (in practical real-life
> elections) if margins are used?
>
> I reply:
>
> Yes, voters would be more likely to regr
On Feb 20, 2007, at 15:39 , Michael Ossipoff wrote: > Juho wrote: > > My
sympathies towards minmax(margins) come primarily from the way > it handles
sincere votes. > > I reply: > > But there wont be sincere votes for it to
handle, to the extent > that it doesnt allow sincere votes. Thats wh
