Warren said: , but it is obvious to me that you messed up for several reasons). I reply: ...which you are unable to articulate. Apparently some sort of petty spite is among your reasons. well, alright. Your formula has 1.plainly wrong asymptotic behavior and I reply: BF's rounding points approach those of Webster, in the limit of larger pairs of consecutive integers. Between 0 and 1 it's an improper integral, but when it's evaluated, the rounding point is at 1/e. Warren continues: 2.plainly wrong specific values (after some computing) I reply: ...which Warren has never specified. Warren continues , and 3.this sort of formula simply never arises in the ways you said, so it must be wrong. I reply: The meaning of that isn't at all clear. Warren said: I have no responsibility to find errors in your derivation I reply: Regrettably your reticence doesn't extend to not making many angrily-worded unsuported claims. Mike Ossipoff _________________________________________________________________ Fixing up the home? Live Search can help http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG _________________________________________________________________ The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes is here. Get all the scoop. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline2 ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info