Re: [EM] Paul: Your ramblings about sincerity

2005-10-12 Thread Paul Kislanko
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > MIKE OSSIPOFF > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:05 PM > To: election-methods@electorama.com > Subject: [EM] Paul: Your ramblings about sincerity > > > Paul Kislanko says: > > If your definition is not universally applicable,

Re: [EM] Paul: Your ramblings about sincerity

2005-10-11 Thread Paul Kislanko
e- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > MIKE OSSIPOFF > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EM] Paul: Your ramblings about sincerity > > > Paul Kislanko says: > > If your definition is not uni

[EM] Paul: Your ramblings about sincerity

2005-10-11 Thread MIKE OSSIPOFF
Paul Kislanko says: If your definition is not universally applicable, don't expect laymen to accept it. I reply: What do you mean by universally applicable? My criteria and their supporting definitions are universally applicable in the sense that they apply to all methods. The usefulness of