Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)

2006-11-03 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 06:14 AM 11/1/2006, Dave Ketchum wrote: >A normal election is usually not close enough to a tie for what ONE voter >does to make a difference. If, generally, the collection of voters that >consider A and B tolerable vote your strategy, A and B can tie; if each >who has a clear preference votes

Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Ketchum
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:22:56 +0100 (CET) Kevin Venzke wrote: > Hello, > > -- Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > >>Quoting from below: >> > >> > These results suggest to me that in the zero-info case, if there are >> > thought to be more than about 2 other voters, Range should be voted >

Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave)

2006-10-31 Thread Kevin Venzke
Hello, -- Dave Ketchum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Quoting from below: > > > > These results suggest to me that in the zero-info case, if there are > > thought to be more than about 2 other voters, Range should be voted > > as in Approval. > > > > D. Zero-info Approval strategy. The vote