I like RPR. The additional control that this gives to voters might make voters
less squimish about proxy.
Forest
<>
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
> > In the runoff election, the plurality wins.
> I don't think it is appropriate to call it a plurality really. You
> would need 50% + 1 votes to get elected (unless the "other side"
> doesn't unify against you, and then that is tacit support).
The plurality was on purpose. If no alliance is
From: Allen Pulsifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The ballot allows a each voter to first vote for their preferred
winner, and
> then mark their approval/disapproval of all other candidates.
> If one candidate gets a majority of the votes, he or she wins. If
not,
> there is a runoff election. In the
Here's another proposal for a voting system.
Since all voting systems are to some extent strategic, the goal of this
system is to enable each voter of groups of voters to achieve their best
strategic outcome, consistent with their political power.
Here's how it would work:
The ballot allows a ea
