At 11:54 PM 10/15/2005, Chris Benham wrote:
>Abd,
>You wrote:
>
>>Note that if the method allows equal ranking, adding clones does
>>not require additional ranks.
>How on earth do you work that out? "Require" for what purpose?
If a method does not allow equal ranking, and if full ranking is
des
Rob,
--- Rob Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > As Mike said, MMPO satisfies all three of these (and Sincere Favorite).
> > But it fails SDSC (and minimal defense) and Plurality.
> [...]
> > Failing Plurality is
> > probably not acceptable in a public election, since it makes the winner
>
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply.
I'll have to think about some elements of your mail, but there are
pieces I want to respond to right away.
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 05:55 +0200, Kevin Venzke wrote:
> --- Rob Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Here's a related set of questions I've been meani
Rob,
--- Rob Lanphier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Here's a related set of questions I've been meaning to ask:
>
> 1. Are the Later No Harm (LNH) criterion and the Sincere Favorite
> Criterion (SFC) mutually incompatible?
It seems I've caused some confusion. "Sincere Favorite" is my votes-on
Abd,
You wrote:
>Note that if the method allows equal ranking, adding clones does not
>require additional ranks.
>
How on earth do you work that out? "Require" for what purpose?
You seem to be assuming that it doesn't matter which member of a set of
clones wins, which is odd
because it is perf
I have no idea. I know australia makes trunc illegal and uses various STV
and IRV schemes. There is some web page listing countries & voting methods.
If you find it let me know
election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
At 10:58 AM 10/15/2005, Warren Smith wrote:
>I did not say voters always want full rankings.
>
>What I said was, I think there is a substantial SUBCLASS of elections,
>in which, all voters (except perhaps for a few who are insane or writing
>illegible ballots or something random like that) will wan
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 10:58 -0400, Warren Smith wrote:
> I did not say voters always want full rankings.
>
> What I said was, I think there is a substantial SUBCLASS of elections,
> in which, all voters (except perhaps for a few who are insane or writing
> illegible ballots or something random lik
Warren,
>What I said was, I think there is a substantial SUBCLASS of elections,
>in which, all voters (except perhaps for a few who are insane or writing
>illegible ballots or something random like that) will want to provide full
>rankings.
>
I agree with you, and for elections like that there w
What are the countries that make truncated ballots illegal and what are
the types of elections involved?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Joseph Malkevitch
Department of Mathematics
York College (CUNY)
Jamaica, New York 11451
Phone: 718-262-2551
Web page: http://www.york.cuny.edu/~malk
election-methods
Warren,
--- Warren Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I did not say voters always want full rankings.
>
> What I said was, I think there is a substantial SUBCLASS of elections,
> in which, all voters (except perhaps for a few who are insane or writing
> illegible ballots or something random li
I did not say voters always want full rankings.
What I said was, I think there is a substantial SUBCLASS of elections,
in which, all voters (except perhaps for a few who are insane or writing
illegible ballots or something random like that) will want to provide full
rankings.
If your voting meth
12 matches
Mail list logo
