On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:00 , Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gervase Lam wrote:
>
>>> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 -0700
>>> From: Jonathan Lundell
>>> Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote
At 07:04 PM 10/8/2007, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>>Are we saying that a bullet vote for Abraham Lincoln is insincere?
>>Why? The voter has essentially set an approval cutoff between
>>Abraham Lincoln and Adolf Hitler. In this case, that isn't even
>>questionable, it is quite sincere.
>
>Which is exac
On Oct 8, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gervase Lam wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 -0700
>> From: Jonathan Lundell
>> Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media
>
>> On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:53 AM 10/7/2007, Brian Olson wrote:
>
h
> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 -0700
> From: Jonathan Lundell
> Subject: Re: [Election-Methods] Bullet Voting in the wider media
> On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> > At 11:53 AM 10/7/2007, Brian Olson wrote:
> >> http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/10/07/
On Oct 7, 2007, at 8:31 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 08:34 PM 10/7/2007, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
>> The term "insincere" is an unfortunate shorthand for something other
>> than the usual dictionary meaning. In this form of election, I take
>> it to mean voting, for strategic reasons, for
