Hi,
Fred Gohlke wrote:
This site focuses on methods of conducting elections, but most posts
address only a single aspect of that topic; the way votes are counted.
Is not the object for which votes are cast a matter of even greater
concern? When our public officials are not representative
Just an addendum from previous post (Minimum Distance Condorcet Completion). I'm curious about voting methods that take ranked ballot methods and adapt them to range ballots. For example, with Baldwin's method, you take drop the candidate with the lowest Borda score, recalculate, and so on. A
Check also James Green-Armytage's cardinal-weighted pairwise
comparison method if you haven't don that yet. = http://
fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/cwp13.htm
Can you also clarify a bit how step 3 is counted when some candidate
X is beaten by two other candidates (Y and Z).
I find
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Check also James Green-Armytage's cardinal-weighted pairwise comparison method if you haven't don that yet. = http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/cwp13.htmThanks, I'll do that!Can you also clarify a bit how step 3 is counted when some candidate X is beaten by two other
On Mar 2, 2008, at 17:45 , Fred Gohlke wrote:
SEEKING IMPROVEMENT
We do not need partisanship, which sets one person against
another; we need independent representatives who will think for
themselves and reach intelligent decisions on matters of public
concern.
In other words, to
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:45:42 -0500 Fred Gohlke wrote:
This site focuses on methods of conducting elections, but most posts
address only a single aspect of that topic; the way votes are counted.
Is not the object for which votes are cast a matter of even greater
concern? When our public
