At 11:21 PM 3/23/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:35:13 -0400 Warren Smith wrote:
The YN model - a simple voting model in which range voting behaves
optimally while many competing voting systems (including Condorcet)
can behave pessimally:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:35:13 -0400 Warren Smith wrote:
The YN model - a simple voting model in which range voting behaves
optimally while many competing voting systems (including Condorcet)
can behave pessimally:
At 01:27 PM 3/24/2008, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
So we eliminate, for the individual voter, the exact match candidate.
We now have a choice of candidates who agree with the voter on three
out of four issues. The problem, you will note, isn't solved on that
web page. We could make a nice neat
thanks Abd.
I was going to use Eric Gorr's online Condorcet calculator to do
this election, but it turned out his calculator has bugs - probably
related to my
names being things like YYNY being too similar.
Also his contact Gorr with email button also has a bug (it sends
your message to nowhere)
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:53:42 -0400 Warren Smith wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Dave Ketchum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:35:13 -0400 Warren Smith wrote:
The YN model - a simple voting model in which range voting behaves
optimally while many competing
