On Mar 29, 2008, at 5:05 , Fred Gohlke wrote:
> Good Morning, Juho
>
> Very well said. I hope you're right. I hope we can improve our
> political systems in less than 200 years. But, as you point out, "...
> the current establishment always has clear reasons to oppose any
> changes." That will
> Building on those thoughts, let's try something with Plurality:
> Start with that collection of voters and issues.
> Invert all the issues so that a Y will attract the same voters as an
> N did, and an N will attract those who had gone for Y.
> Note that will now attract
I was trying to visit http://rangevoting.org/ to see if there was
anything about an automated strategy to convert Range votes into
Approval votes (just to move strategy from a hit-or-miss process on the
part of certain savvy voters to something applied universally), and it
looks like the web pa
Good Evening, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
I prefer to exchange views with you on the Election-Methods site.
The way we select those who represent us in our government is critical
to our society, which embodies all manner of people. To create an
effective political structure I'm anxious to get thoughtf
Looking closer, I tripped on this one:
>> Note that will now attract the same 5 voters who had gone for
>> , and the new will get 0 votes.
Saying it more carefully:
>> Note that previous , now labelled , will attract the same
5 voters who had gone for , and
