At 10:27 PM 3/30/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>Runoffs main value is recovering from a methods weaknesses until
>something can be done about the method. They are too expensive to
>be accepted as if a normal part of a usable method.
What is missed here is that the basic requirement for an election
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:54:40 -0400 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:54:40 -0400 Abd
ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 08:30 AM 3/30/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:28:22 -0400 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>>
>>>At 03:32 PM 3/29/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>>>
>>>
Some see forest; some see trees
These election auditing methods work no matter how many candidates or
winners in a race. However, they would not yet work for any rank order
voting system. You guys might want to work on extending the
mathematics of election auditing so that they would. Kathy
---
March 30, 2008
A New Measure of E
http://RangeVoting.org
Sorry for the downtime.
I am way behind on site updates too.
For example, a goodly chunk of the site has been translated into
Spanish but that is not yet available online.
--
Warren D. Smith
http://RangeVoting.org <-- add your endorsement (by clicking "endorse"
as 1st step
At 08:30 AM 3/30/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:28:22 -0400 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>>At 03:32 PM 3/29/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>>
>>>Some see forest; some see trees; who sees all?
>>
>>Those who see a forest made up of trees.
>>
>>>Looking at the 31 voter Plurality example:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:28:22 -0400 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 03:32 PM 3/29/2008, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>
>> Some see forest; some see trees; who sees all?
>
>
> Those who see a forest made up of trees.
>
>> Looking at the 31 voter Plurality example:
>> 16 voted for candidates with 3 or
