Re: [Election-Methods] method design challenge + new method AMP

2008-05-09 Thread Juho
On May 9, 2008, at 10:46 , Jobst Heitzig wrote: Dear Raphfrk you wrote: One issue with random processes is that they don't work well for a legislature. A majority would just keep asking that the vote be repeated until they win it. Saying that a re-vote cannot occur unless the situation

Re: [Election-Methods] [english 95%] Re: [english 94%] Re: method design challenge +new method AMP

2008-05-09 Thread Juho
On May 9, 2008, at 13:39 , Jobst Heitzig wrote: Dear Juho, you wrote: (Roughly the question is if one wants to give Stalin and other unwanted fellows a small probability to become elected or a zero probability.) I don't think this is the point. To the contrary, bringing up such examples

Re: [Election-Methods] method design challenge +new method AMP

2008-05-09 Thread Jobst Heitzig
Dear Juho, you wrote: Yes, but as I see it the reasons are different. In a typical non- deterministic method like random ballot I think it is the intention to give all candidates with some support also some probability of becoming elected. Not at all! At least in those non-deterministic

Re: [Election-Methods] method design challenge +new method AMP

2008-05-09 Thread Juho
On May 9, 2008, at 20:27 , Jobst Heitzig wrote: Dear Juho, you wrote: Yes, but as I see it the reasons are different. In a typical non- deterministic method like random ballot I think it is the intention to give all candidates with some support also some probability of becoming elected. Not