Hi Juho,
A quick response.
--- En date de : Mar 8.7.08, Juho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Ok, this is a good concrete example scenario. The votes are
> of course
> simplified. Surely there would be also considerable number
> of other
> kind of opinions than these three.
> But let's see fi
Hi Terry,
--- En date de : Mer 9.7.08, Terry Bouricius
> In
> contrast to what your report claims to show, in fact, ALL
> bona fide voting
> method experts agree that both Approval and IRV meet this
> Pareto
> Improvement Criterion.
Actually, under Douglas Woodall's framework, it could be arg
Markus Schulze > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:45 AM
> > If you are going to mess about with MMP to the
> > extent that you suggest in the hope of making
> > some significant improvements to what is
> > basically a very poor voting system, why not
> > just adopt STV-PR and do the job proper
Dear James Gilmour,
you wrote (10 July 2008):
> If you are going to mess about with MMP to the
> extent that you suggest in the hope of making
> some significant improvements to what is
> basically a very poor voting system, why not
> just adopt STV-PR and do the job properly?
When you promote
