Jobst Heitzig wrote:
Hello all,
although I did not follow all of the discussion so far, the following
question strikes me:
Why the hell do you care about proportional representation of minorities
when the representative body itself does not decide with a method that
ensures a proportional d
> To my understanding, RRV is constructed so that it reduces to D'Hondt if
> people stick to party lines and vote max for all within the party and min to
> the rest. Is that true?
--there is a parameter in RRV that can be adjusted so we get D'Hondt
with one value and Sainte-Lague with
another (and
I've talked to the guy who built it. He lives not too far from where I
do in the Boston area. I'm jealous of his shiny UI. It makes my http://betterpolls.com/
and http://poll.appspot.com/ look clunky and primitive (which is
accurate, since I didn't do anything beyond the 8 year old HTML 4.01
Here's a proof of part (f):
In phase II if my ballot is not one of the ones drawn, then it has no
influence.
So suppose that it is one of the drawn ballots. If all of the drawn ballots,
including mine, approve the phase I winner, then she is elected., and my utility
for the result is exactly
On Jul 31, 2008, at 0:50 , Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
In any case, the left-right problem would still be a limitation to
RRV, where ballots are set so that RV (and any sensible method)
would elect Center first, but where electing an assembly of two
should elect Left and Right. For some r
Juho wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 0:50 , Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
In any case, the left-right problem would still be a limitation to
RRV, where ballots are set so that RV (and any sensible method) would
elect Center first, but where electing an assembly of two should elect
Left and Right.
