At 05:58 AM 1/6/2009, James Gilmour wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 6/1/09, James Gilmour wrote:
> > "If the vote for any one candidate equals or exceeds
> > the votes of all the other candidates combined, that candidate shall
> > be declared elected."
>
> > Here you will see there is no reference to "a
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:19:29 -0500 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 10:28 PM 1/4/2009, Dave Ketchum wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:16:14 -0500 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Perhaps. Perhaps not. That can be a *lot* of preparation, and people
are busy, many don't already, find time for voting. Bull
Good Morning, Kristofer
Thank you very much for the link to the Mother Jones article describing
efforts to curtail the utter domination corporations exert over our
existence. Perhaps, in time, reason will triumph.
re: "Practical Democracy really then has two parts - the
selection phase
> > --- On Tue, 6/1/09, James Gilmour wrote:
> > "If the vote for any one candidate equals or exceeds
> > the votes of all the other candidates combined, that candidate shall
> > be declared elected."
>
> > Here you will see there is no reference to "a
> > quota", nor is there any referen
--- On Tue, 6/1/09, Kathy Dopp wrote:
> > From: Juho Laatu
>
> > How should we see other methods like Range
> > and Condorcet in this light?
>
> That is not a valid comparison because, unlike IRV/STV,
> both Range and
> Condorcet methods consider *all* rankings or ratings that
> *all* voters
>
--- On Tue, 6/1/09, James Gilmour wrote:
> "If the vote for any one candidate equals or exceeds
> the votes of all the other candidates combined, that
> candidate shall be
> declared elected."
> Here you will see there is no reference to "a
> quota", nor is there any reference to "a
> majori
