--- On Mon, 8/6/09, Raph Frank raph...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Juho
Laatujuho4...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
My thinking was that if the question on the
referendum excludes IRV, then the final outcome
is anyway likely to be Schulze (and the
unlikely event of choosing
Warren Smith wrote:
The Schulze-beatpaths page Arpad was probably thinking of was
http://rangevoting.org/SchulzeExplan.html
The information thing now is summarized here
http://rangevoting.org/PuzzInfo1.html
which will be a future puzzle...
I think you should say that ranked ballots with
One problem is nobody really has a good understanding of what good strategy is.
If one believes that range voting becomes approval voting in the
presence of strategic voters (often, anyhow)...
One might similarly speculate that
strategic voters in a system such as Schilze beatpaths ALLOWING
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Jan Kok wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Dave
Ketchumda...@clarityconnect.com wrote:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Jan Kok wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dave Ketchumda...@clarityconnect.com
wrote:
It matters what is said, not whether speaking
I have a rather practical approach to
strategies. Often we talk about theoretical
properties of the methods. I prefer talking
about the practical impacts (of the known
theoretical vulnerabilities) since often
the theoretical cases talk only about some
marginal cases. I'll explain more below.
