How is #1 not a Condorcet Winner, since #1 pairwise-beats every other
alternative?
_
From: election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com
[mailto:election-methods-boun...@lists.electorama.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
Myers
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 4:41 PM
To: Election Methods Mailing
Strike my previous reply... Didn't notice that #6 pairwise beat #1, but
pairwise lost to #2-#5.
Here's a case where I'd actually like to see instead of the pairwise matrix
the matrix that shows counts of votes for #1, #2, ... #5. In particular,
which is the Bucklin winner?
#6 loses or ties
On 1/30/11 2:39 PM, Paul Kislanko wrote:
Strike my previous reply... Didn't notice that #6 pairwise beat #1,
but pairwise lost to #2-#5.
Here's a case where I'd actually like to see instead of the pairwise
matrix the matrix that shows counts of votes for #1, #2, ... #5. In
particular, which is
HB240 is a New Hampshire bill to allow Approval voting for all state
offices and Presidential primaries. Here is the link to the Slashdot story:
http://politics.slashdot.org/story/11/01/30/1911232/New-Hampshire-Bill-Could-Lead-To-Adoption-of-Approval-Voting#comments
I would be very happy to
This is a HUGE deal!
I believe there will be a hearing on this bill at the NH State
Legislature this TUESDAY. Can anyone go and testify in its favor,
either this Tuesday, or possibly at some later hearings?
Thanks,
- Jan
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Michael Rouse mrou...@mrouse.com wrote:
1 has a path to 6 at least as strong as 6's path to 1, namely 136, at 15-11
and 14-11. It
seems a little odd, to me at least, that 6's path to 1 should benefit 2 but not
6 itself.
Starting from the top seems the only way of ensuring that the path that orders
the two
candidates relative to each
It's a little tough to spot without the coloring that CIVS does, but #1
loses pairwise to #6. This makes #2 win according to Schulze. As Markus
points out, #2 is the candidate with the weakest pairwise defeat (13-9
vs the 14-13 defeat of #1 by #6).
-- Andrew
On 1/30/11 2:33 PM, Paul Kislanko
Hi Aaron,
--- En date de : Dim 30.1.11, Aaron Armitage eutychus_sl...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
1 has a path to 6 at least as strong as 6's path to 1, namely 136, at
15-11 and 14-11. It
seems a little odd, to me at least, that 6's path to 1 should benefit 2
but not 6 itself.
When you say benefit do
